The 65% Solution

December 4, 2010

The 65% Solution was developed at Province Lake Golf Club, the course that my wife and I owned for ten years. We based it on our experience at other courses we played and observations of players at our course. The forward tees at Province Lake play at 4,169 yards. Golf Digest Women rates Province Lake as No. 25 on their list of America’s Top 50 Courses for Women and No. 1 in New England.

The 65% Solution

There is a simple method for determining the total length of the course that players with driver swing speeds of 60MPH or less should be playing: Multiply the yardage of the course that most men would play by 65 percent. For instance, if that yardage is 6,300 yards, then the 60MPH swinger should play a course of approximately 4,095 yards (6,300 x .65 = 4,095).

The 65% Solution is based on the fact that the men, on average, hit their tee shots 207 yards. The “average” woman hits her tee shots 135 yards. 135 divided by 207 equals 65 percent. This methodology should also be applied to individual holes. The chart below offers examples:


*Note: If a hole plays significantly up hill, it is better to use 60 percent.

You’ll find that carrying a small calculator makes calculating the 65 percent much easier. It is also helpful to carry a laser measuring device. It is much easier to use one of these devices to locate your own teeing ground than having to count the yardage as you step it off.

You may find that a slightly different percentage works better for you. The basic principal is that players with slower swing speeds should play a course that allows them to reach most, if not all, of the greens in regulation with well struck shots. As a result, if you find that the 65% Solution results in a course on which you are unable to reach the greens in regulation, make an adjustment to a lower percentage.

–Arthur Little

15 Comments for this entry

  • This is among the most incredible blogs Ive read in a really long time. The amount of details in here is stunning, like you practically wrote the book on the subject. Your weblog is great for anybody who desires to recognize this subject far more. Wonderful stuff; please maintain it up!

  • Finally, an issue that I am passionate about. I have looked for information of this caliber for the last several hours. Your site is greatly appreciated.

  • pieczatki says:

    I like this web site very much so much great information.

  • Cheap hermes says:

    It absolutely was the pleasure finding your website last night. We arrived right here nowadays hoping to get new things. I had been not really frustrated. Your opinions upon fresh methods on this point had been beneficial plus an superb help me personally. Thank you for removing time and energy to write out this stuff as well as for discussing the notions.

  • free laptops says:

    Deeply blown away by the stature of attentiveness on this page. There are a lot of amazing resources here. I am sure I will check out this page quite a bit.

  • How you been, us over at GE positively love your site. This website is usually the first thing we check in the beggining of the week. Please Keep up the good post!

  • Dan G, PGA says:

    Bravo! Just found this sight. It is awesome and echos so much of what I’ve been talking about among my peers in the PGA and the golf industry for some time now. I love the honesty and reality. In my experience there are very few golf courses ever designed with women in mind yet now everyone is supposed to focus on growing women’s golf. Courses should start at about 3,500 yards and offer three sets of tees – maybe 3,900 and 4,500 yards. The average forward tee in SW Florida is over 5,000 yards! And covered in palmetto bushes, sand everywhere and water everywhere. This market segment as so sadly been ignored for far too long. Hang in there ladies! I’m working on it in SW Florida!

  • Thank you for your thoughtful post!

  • Your original take on this topic has me thinking about many of the points you shared in this article. This is great content with substance.

  • I can¡¯t remember the last time I enjoyed an article as much as this one. You have gone beyond my expectations on this topic and I agree with your points. You¡¯ve done well with this.

  • e-ticaret says:

    fantastic submit, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite experts of this sector do not notice this. You should continue your writing. I’m sure, you’ve a great readers’ base already!

  • I really relate to that post. Thanks for the info.

  • e-ticaret says:

    whoah this blog is wonderful i love studying your articles. Stay up the good work! You already know, lots of persons are searching around for this information, you could help them greatly.

  • JaimeC says:

    I believe that all tee boxes should be handicap related, not gender related. I play in a travel league with 89 men and 2 women. We, women, drive 185-230 yards with handicap of 14 and 18. We play the red tees because they are the “womens” tees. We have men with handicaps as high as 32 and should play the “forward” (red) tees based on handicap (or by your calculation, swing speed). This would improve pace of play even more. How do we fix this?

    Also I prefer to play one or two tee boxes back due to the landing area being more favorable to my distance. People do not realize that a course is designed with a squeeze in the fairway lined with trouble. Generally the landing area is wider behind or in front of that squeeze where you want to be and you should adjust your play to the correct distance.

  • admin says:

    Jaime,
    You are right on both counts…..
    As you note, golfers should play a set of tees based on their swing speed (even better indicator than handicap) not their gender or age.
    Their driver swing speed determines the average length of their drives. For instance, a 75mph swing speed will have an average drive of
    165 yards and 95mph an average drive of 215…think 25 yards increase for every 10 mph increase in swing speed.
    As a “rule of thumb,” golfers should play a course that is 28-30 times their average drive to be able to reach the great majority of greens
    in regulation.
    If you could ever get your group to a course that would measure all the players swing speeds and then get them to play the “right” set of tees,
    I bet two things would happen:
    -most players would enjoy themselves more
    -speed of play would increase markedly.

    On your second point, architects put the “squeeze” in the design of a hole to make players think about how much risk they want to take. This adds
    to the strategy of the hole and makes golfers think whether they want to challenge the risk by trying to hit past it. Playing a set of tees that
    puts your normal tee shot right in the risk area is not what the architect intended. In your case, feel free to move back.
    Arthur Little

1 Trackback or Pingback for this entry

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


7 − two =

p5rn7vb